Meaning behind the Poem: An Analysis of Transitivity of Poems for Students at English Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Mathla’ul Anwar University Banten

  • Ari Fajria Novari Mathla'ul Anwar University
  • Rizdki Elang Gumelar Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar
Keywords: transitivity, type of process, experiential meaning, poetry.

Abstract

The study aims to be analyzed observed meaning in poetry written by English Department at of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Mathla’ul Anwar University. It applied Halliday Systemic Functional Grammar to identify and analyze the occurrences of processes in the poetry. Gerrot and Wignell (2008:6) explain that the theory of grammar is needed to know the text working. By using the theory, the reader will understand the text clearly. One of the ways to convey meaning is by analyzing the transitivity pattern in the poetry. Transitivity is represented experiential meaning that are meaning about the world experience and what is going on in the clause. The authors applied descriptive analysis method, it was in order to elaborate the appearing process types of transitivity in poems and to describe the percentage of process types. After determining the type of process for each predicator, the percentages were counting and comparing one to another independently in each poem. Further, the choice of processes and patterns lead to the discussion on the purposes and effects. The examination on the transitivity analysis shows that the processes employed to meaning behind the poems using transitivity are material, mental, relational, verbal, and behavioral processes. The processes tell particular significant to the process of meaning. For instance, material processes frequently dominated the meaning of the poems. The other transitivity processes resemble the purpose and effect based on their meanings. Hopefully, this paper might serve an example of how to examine the language patterns in a literary work to further observe the purposes and the effects of the patterns.

References

Abed, K.Q. and Mohammed, M.A. (2015). Transitivity As a Means of Communication: A Stylistic Study of Langston Hughes’s Selected Early Poems. International Journal of Multifaceted and Multilingual Studies, Volume-1, Issue-VI ISSN (Online): 2350-0476 pp 1-16
Alden, Raymond Macdonald. 2012. An Introduction to Poetry: For Students of English Literature. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Chapman, Margareth and Kathleen Welton. 2010. Poetry: for Beginners. Danbury: Writers and Readers Inc.
Chatton, Barbara. 2010. Using Poetry Across the Curriculum: Learning to Love Language. Santa Barbara: Library Unlimited.
Gerot, L &Wignell, P. (1995). Making Senses of Functional Grammar. New South Wales: GerdStabler.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1993. Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition, London: Edward Arnold.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1980).
Linaberger, M. (2004). Poetry top 10: A foolproof formula for teaching poetry. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 366-372.doi: 10.l598/RT.58.4.6, from EBSCO online database Academic Search Complete.
Luce-Kapler, R. (2009). Serendipity, poetry and inquiry. In M. Prendergast, C. D. Leggo, & P. Sameshima (Eds.). Poetic inquiry: Vibrant voices in the social sciences (pp. 75-78). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Mehmood, A, Amber, R, Ameer, S, and Faiz, R. (2014).Transitivity Analysis:Representationof Love in Wilde’s The Nightingale And The Rose. European Journal of Research in Social Science.2(4).
Peskin, J., Allen, G., & Wells-Jopling, R. (2010). The educated imagination: Applying instructional research to the teaching of symbolic interpretation of poetry. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(6), 498-507.
Raffel, B. (2010). The art of translating poetry. Pennsylvania, PA: State University Press. 14. Rutherford ,Marty. (2009). Poetry inside out: bridging cultures through language. Journal of English Teaching: Practice and Critique Volume 8. (2) 132 R etrieved from http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2009v8n2nar
Saragih, Amrin. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.
Seylar, Dorothy U. 2004. The Reading Context: Developing College Reading Skills. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Stedman, Edward Clarence. 2004. The Nature and the Elements of Poetry. Montana: Kessinger Publishing.
Tafsirah Mulyana, Kiem. The Elements of Poetry.
Published
2022-10-01
How to Cite
Novari, A., & Gumelar, R. (2022). Meaning behind the Poem: An Analysis of Transitivity of Poems for Students at English Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Mathla’ul Anwar University Banten. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 8(2), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202282.245
Section
Articles