Proses Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP Bergaya Belajar Pragmatis Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar
Abstract
This study will reveal the nature of the Reflective Thinking Process of Junior High School Students with Pragmatic Learning Style in Solving Problems in Curved Side Space Building Materials. This research was conducted in MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The research subjects were 9th grade students of MTs. Miftahul Ulum Ngembal, Pasuruan. The number of subjects in this study amounted to 2 MTs students with pragmatic learning style. Researchers in this qualitative research, act as the main instrument. While the supporting instruments in this study were in the form of test sheets, questionnaires, and interview guidelines. The results showed that: 1) In the Reacting phase. In the reacting phase, subject 1 was not able to mention in detail what was known but was able to mention what was asked and was unable to explain in detail the relationship between what was asked and what was known. While subject 2 is able to mention in detail what is known and what is being asked, and is able to explain in detail the relationship between what is asked and what is known. 2) In the Comparing phase. In this phase, subject 1 is able to explain the answers to the problems obtained, remember the formula used to answer the questions, and be able to relate the problems asked to the problems at hand. While subject 2 is able to remember the formula needed, but unable to apply it to the problem. So there is an error in answering the question. 3) In the Contemplating phase. In this phase, both subjects were able to detect errors and truths, and were able to correct errors. But at the time of concluding, subject 1 could conclude correctly, and subject 2 could not conclude correctly, because of errors made during the comparing phase.
References
Aziz, Z., Yi, T. X., Alwia, S., & Jet, C. N. (2013). Learning style preferences of pharmacy students. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 4(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.2013.1.14
Connie, S.L. NG., & Charlene T. (2006). Investigating Singapore pre-service teachers’ ill-structured problem-solving processes in an asynchronous online environment: implications for reflective thinking. Nanyang Technological University: Learning Sciences and Technologies Academic Group.
Duff, A. and Duffy, T. (2002), “Psychometric properties of Honey and Mumford’s learning styles questionnaire (LSQ)”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 147-163.
Fauzi, Muhammad. 2013. Perbedaan Karakteristik Gaya Belajar Guru Ditinjau dari Mata Pelajaran yang diampu pada Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) dan Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) di Surabaya. Jurnal Psikologi dan Perkembangan
Gurol, A. (2011). Determining the reflective thinking skills of pre-service teachers in learning and teaching process. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 387-402.
Harel., Sowder. 2005. Advanced Mathematical - Thinking at any Age: Its Nature and Its Development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning volume 7(1): 27-50.
Kappe, F. R., Boekholt, L., den Rooyen, C., & Van der Flier, H. (2009). A predictive validity study of the Learning Style Questionnaire (Lsq) using multiple, specific learning criteria. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 464–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.04.001
Kassim, H. 2013. The relationship between learning styles, creative thinking performance and multimedia learning materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Page 229 – 237.
Kurniawati, L. (2011). Developing mathematical reflektive thinking skills through problem based learning. Proceeding International Seminar and the Fourth National Conference on Mathematics Education Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta.
Kusumaningrum, M., & Saefudin, A. A. (2012). Mengoptimalkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematika Melalui Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. (Artikel) Seminar Nasional. Yogyakarta: Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas PGRI.
Mohaffyza, Mimi. 2011. Relationship between Learning Style and Creative Thinking in Problem Solving Skills among Building Construction Students in Vocational School. Conference: 15th International Conference on Thinking.
Muin, A. (2011). The situations that can being reflective thinking process in mathematics learning. International Seminar and the Fourth National Conference on Mathematics Education 2011 Department of Mathematics Education. Yogyakarta State University 234 Yogyakarta.
Noer, S. H. (2008). Problem-based learning dan kemampuan berpikir reflektif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. FKIP Universitas Lampung.
Peter, Honey, Mumford, Alan. 2006. The Learning Styles Questionnaire, 80-item version (Revised edition, July 2006). Maidenhead Berks: Peter Honey Publications Limited. K. E. Lestari, dan M.R. Yudhanegara. 2015. Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Rohmah, M & S. Sutiarso. 2018. Analysis Problem Solving in Mathematical Using Theory Newman. EURASIA Journal Of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Volume 12, No. 2. Page 671-681.
Sadler‐Smith, E. (2001). Does the learning styles questionnaire measure style or process? A reply to swailes and senior(1999). International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00173
Surya E. Putri Andriana.F. & Mukhtar. 2017. Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability And Self-Confidence Of High School Students Through Contextual Learning Model. Journal on Mathematics Education. Volume 8, No. 1, January 2017, pp. 85-94.
Susanto, H.A. 2011. Pemahaman Pemecahan Masalah Pembuktian Sebagai Sarana Berpikir Kreatif. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Copyright (c) 2021 Rosita Dwi Ferdiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
